Connect with us

Running Back Prospects

2026 Prospects

Evaluated Through the Vikings Lens

Running back evaluation is about more than production — it’s about role, efficiency, and value. The Skol Draft Room 2026 Running Back Prospects page breaks down the upcoming class with a focus on how backs fit within the Minnesota Vikings’ offensive structure and roster-building philosophy.

This isn’t a highlight reel ranking. It’s an assessment of traits, usage, and sustainability — viewed through the reality of positional value and modern NFL offenses.

How We Evaluate Running Backs

Running backs are judged on how they function within the system, not just how many yards they produce. Our evaluations prioritize:

  • Vision and processing at the line of scrimmage

  • Decisiveness and burst through designed lanes

  • Contact balance and finish

  • Pass-catching ability and route versatility

  • Pass protection reliability

  • Ball security and situational awareness

Explosiveness matters — but consistency keeps backs on the field.

Fit Within the Vikings Offense

Minnesota’s offense asks running backs to be more than early-down runners. Each prospect is evaluated on their ability to:

  • Execute zone concepts with patience and precision

  • Contribute in the passing game as a receiver

  • Hold up in protection on key downs

  • Complement existing skill sets already on the roster

Versatility often determines value more than raw rushing totals.

Role-Based Rankings, Not Just Stars

The 2026 running back class is diverse — featuring every-down options, complementary backs, and situational specialists. This page distinguishes between:

  • Three-down backs

  • Rotational and committee fits

  • Third-down and change-of-pace roles

  • Developmental depth options

Not every effective NFL back needs to be a feature player.

Draft Value & Longevity

Running back value is closely tied to cost and longevity. Our rankings weigh:

  • Draft capital vs. expected role

  • Mileage and usage history

  • Skill sets that age well

  • Ability to provide value on rookie contracts

The goal isn’t to overspend — it’s to maximize production efficiently.

Building the Backfield

Skol Draft Room evaluates running backs as part of a complete offensive ecosystem, not in isolation. Every prospect is viewed through how they complement the roster, the scheme, and the long-term plan.

Because in today’s NFL, the best backfields are built with intention — not impulse.

Running Back Prospects
RK PLAYER SCHOOL YEAR POS POS RK HT WT
3 Jeremiyah Love Notre Dame Jr RB 1 6-0 214
4 Jadarian Price Notre Dame Jr RB 2 5-11 210
18 Jonah Coleman Washington Sr RB 3 5-9 220
21 Emmett Johnson Nebraska Sr RB 4 5-11 220
30 Seth McGowan Kentucky Sr RB 5 5-11 219
37 Nic Singleton Penn State Jr RB 6 6-4 210
38 Kaytron Allen Penn State Jr RB 7 5-11 219
60 Demond Claiborne Wake Forest Jr RB 8 6-4 200
61 Mike Washington Jr. Arkansas Sr RB 9 5-9 170
67 J’Mari Taylor Virginia Sr RB 10 5-11 180
70 Le’Veon Moss Texas A&M Sr RB 11 6-2 220
71 Jaydn Ott Oklahoma Sr RB 12 6-5 215
73 Desmond Reid Pittsburgh RB 13 6-3 205
80 Robert Henry Jr. UTSA Sr RB 14 6-1 204
84 Roman Hemby Indiana Jr RB 15 5-11 190
86 Terion Stewart Virginia Tech Sr RB 16 6-1 224
89 Rahsul Faison South Carolina Jr RB 17 5-10 180
101 Kaelon Black Indiana Sr RB 18 6-2 213
105 Chip Trayanum Toledo Sr RB 19 5-11 180
120 Jamal Haynes Georgia Tech Sr RB 20 6-0 190
Click for more positional rankings

SKOL’s 100 BIG BOARD

Quarterbacks | Full BackWide ReceiverTight End | Tackle | IOL

DEF LineEDGELinebackerCornerbackSafety

KickerPunter

Advertisement

Must See

Verified by MonsterInsights